Deciphering the Administration’s New Proposed Rules on the Contraceptive Mandate | Capital Commentary

Deciphering the Administration’s New Proposed Rules on the Contraceptive Mandate | Capital Commentary by Stanley Carlson-Thies.  MGB: Religious employers who are not churches are, in effect, agents of the government seeking to regulate the right to use contraception freely.  That would be equivalent of trying to ban it, which would violate the whole privacy chain put in place by Grisswold v. Connecticut.  I doubt that this will happen.  This situation will be ended quietly, as the entire issue was meant to activate women for Obama for the 2012 election.  Now that the election is over, accommodations will be made.  Note also that contraceptive coverage has been mandatory on preventative policies purchased outside since December 2000. The only questions now are mandates and copays.  As for whether these procedures cause abortion, they don't.  Life does not begin until gastrulation, when the genes of both parents control development.  When only maternal genes control, the maternal soul is controlling as well - if you define the soul as the energy in the life force that keeps it from achieving entropy.  At gastrulation, a new energy takes over for a unique individual.  In other words, the Movement could win the issue by conceding this point.